Talking Shorts

Talking Shorts

log in sign up
  • Films
  • Reads
  • Talks
  • Festivals
  • New Critics & New Audiences Award
  • About
  • Team
  • Support Us
  • Contributions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Imprint
  • The END
Talking Shortstalkingshorts.com

Patterns Of Modern Jealousy
Symbiosis

Review by Līga Požarska
published in Films, Archive
published on 30.03.2020
Share   facebook linkedIn link

In Symbiosis, Hungarian animator Nadja Andrasev tells the story of a deceived wife who starts a bizarre investigation of her husband’s infidelities.

Symbiosis
Symbiosis
Title
Symbiosis
Original title
Symbiosis
Length
10'
Year
2019
Country
France
Genre
Eroticism, Romance
Category
Animation
Director
Nadja Andrasev
Producer
Emmanuel-Alain Raynal, Pierre Baussaron, Orsolya Sipos, József Fülöp
Cinematography
Balázs Varjú Tóth
Editor
Judit Czakó
Sound
Péter Benjámin Lukács
Composer
Mads Vadsholt
Festivals
Annecy 2019, Slamdance Film Festival 2019, KROK International Animated Film Festival 2019, Uppsala Short Film Festival 2019, SXSW 2020, Go Short – International Short Film Festival Nijmegen 2020, Encounters Film Festival 2020, Leuven International Short Film Festival 2020

Hungarian animator Nadja Andrasev’s animation film Symbiosis tells the story of a deceived wife who begins a bizarre investigation of her husband’s infidelities. What starts as jealousy grows into scrupulous research, bordering with voyeurism. The wife follows the cheater, tracks down his numerous lovers, and starts to collect a freakish scrapbook of evidence. Andrasev compares jealousy and the jungle, depicting the betrayed wife in her husband’s tropical hunting field. We know that female hunters rule this animal planet while the guy passively enjoys and obeys.

Symbiosis is an aesthetically pleasing film: bright precious stone colours—emerald, ruby, sugilite purple—dominate and strongly contrast the film’s otherwise ascetic surroundings. Despite being highly decorative, images are decluttered from unnecessary embellishments, leaving place solely for the items that serve a purpose. Andrasev has shaped an urban environment with high skyscrapers, whose windows serve as walls, captivating each character in a glass shell. Regrettably, this couple’s modern minimalistic apartment accompanies their modern minimalistic marriage. Is this what some relationships have become—treating spouses as distant roommates? The absence of dialogue adds to the lack of communication between the couple. The only rare emitted sounds in Symbiosis are distant chattering and a routine “hey”.

By diluting animation with real-life images from women’s booty call photos, Symbiosis breaks the wall between an animated illusion and realistic adultery. The lack of character identification reinforces this feeling. Unnamed heroes remind us that an abstract case can quickly become a New York Times “Modern Love” or a cautionary tale exchanged between friends during a gossip night.

In Symbiosis, mistresses are associated with insects, birds, and cats of prey (primarily tigers). The scratch marks on her husband’s body show how wild these creatures can be. Nevertheless, a great deal of attention is given to “humanising” them—the audience catches a glimpse of their lives and somewhat sad eyes. Andrasev hasn’t portrayed “the other women” in a bad light, nor the protagonist in a desperate and hysterical one. She is strategically acknowledging the situation. Besides, the more she investigates, the more she tries to redirect her husband’s interest toward her. Regardless of that, her sensual nightgowns don’t arouse him: this man is hungry for new experiences and preoccupied with new bodies to discover. If he shifts his desire that easily, what made him settle down in the first place? The film doesn’t address their past but focuses on present action and reaction.

The wife often observes these extramarital liaisons as a lion who stares at a gazelle, waiting for the best moment to attack. But she never seizes the opportunity, choosing not to confront her spouse. She remains with a straight poker face, possibly masterfully repressing pain and insecurity. On the surface, she is not as hurt or shocked as she is curious. Armed with the discreetness of a private detective and the analytical skills of an anthropologist, she meticulously studies the coded sentiments of text messages, thus carefully constructing personality types. A scrapbook of evidence, consisting of physical artifacts like hair, bikini wax stripes, and underwear, allows drawing analogies with the animal world. Do they have softer “fur”? Bigger hips? Fertile genes? Do their pheromones trigger a stronger chemical reaction?

With the given subject matter, it’s hard to avoid clichés. Andrasev chooses to play with them. The man’s portrayal is very vanilla—ordinary, without any character edges. However, the mockery of this cliché is an authentic approach, showing that the women are the ones orchestrating this parade, while the guy is still living in an illusion that he’s the eligible macho type. He’s too lazy to take all the necessary precautions when hiding his affairs. A lack of guilt makes this particular infidelity even dirtier.

In one scene, the wife traces the husband to a more perverted Eyes Wide Shut-type of gentlemen’s club. In another, she observes him getting lucky in the zoo’s tropical house. He appears to be into kinky stuff, yet he is numb when it comes to his own wife’s sexuality. The unevenly shared blanket in their marital bed illustrates the distance between them.

The protagonist’s journey takes different turns and twists. Jealousy triggers research, research triggers comparison, and comparison results in attempts to save the marriage and recreate the sparkle. Unsuccessfully. Symbiosis-wise, the relationship between the couple turns out to be misbalanced and disadvantageous. At the same time, the strange connection between all the involved women can be seen as more symbiotic and mutual. This statement traces the film back to the opening sequence, where the protagonist lets a mosquito suck her blood rather than kill the parasite. After seeing that the mistresses themselves are lonely and dissatisfied, proving that her husband fails to fulfill their desires, the nameless wife makes her piece with these “species” the same way she does with the mosquito—a strange coexistence.

Mentioned Films

Footnotes

Text by

Līga Požarska.

Līga Požarska is a Latvian film journalist and a pre-selection committee member for Riga International Film Festival’s short film programme. She frequently collaborates with other short film festivals across the Baltics. Her bylines include Kino Raksti, Cineuropa and Talking Shorts. Līga is currently pursuing a degree in philology.

More

Comments

There are no comments yet, be the first!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Related

NC&NA Award

We Are Your Friends

Interview with Inès Sieulle by Jason Anderson

Now nominated for Talking Shorts’ New Critics & New Audiences Award 2025, Inès Sieulle talks about her dazzling AI-film The Oasis I Deserve.

NC&NA Award

Lies Alive

Interview with Stephen Vuillemin by Savina Petkova

Now nominated for Talking Shorts’ New Critics & New Audiences Award 2025, Stephen Vuillemin talks about his gorgeously animated short film A Kind of Testament.

NC&NA Award

A Day of Magical Thinking

Interview with Guil Sela by Jan Tracz

If anything terrible happens, best to laugh it off. French filmmaker Guil Sela knows it best, as he has experienced it firsthand in Montsouris Park, now nominated for the New Critics & New Audience Award 2025.

Patterns Of Modern Jealousy — Talking Shorts

Support us

Consider a donation!
Donate

Stay updated
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Thank you!
Your subscription to our list has been confirmed.

Short films are key to cinematic innovation. Because of their brevity, they allow filmmakers to react to the world around them more instinctively and showcase a stunning range of artistic expressions. As a magazine dedicated to short films, Talking Shorts aims to create a wider discourse about this often-overlooked art form.

We strive to produce universally readable content that can inspire, cultivate, and educate a broad range of audiences, from students and scholars to non-cinephile readers, in an attempt to connect filmmakers, audiences, festival organisers, and a young generation of film lovers who might not yet know what short films are or can do.

Since 2023, Talking Shorts is the official outlet of The European Network for Film Discourse (The END), which consists of 8 unique and diverse European film festivals and is funded by the Creative Europe MEDIA Programme of the European Union. Our work and publications are closely connected to the (European) film festival landscape.

Supported by 
Logo: Creative Europe MEDIA
Family Festivals 
Logo: FeKK – Ljubljana Short Film Festival
 
Logo: Filmfest Dresden
 
Logo: Kurzfilm Festival Hamburg
 
Logo: London Short Film Festival
 
Logo: Uppsala Short Film Festival
 
Logo: Vienna Shorts
Partner Festivals 
Logo: Clermont-Ferrand International Short Film Festival
 
Logo: Concorto Film Festival
 
Logo: Dokufest
 
Logo: Drama International Short Film Festival
 
Logo: Festival du nouveau cinéma (FNC)
 
Logo: Festival Regard
 
Logo: Glasgow Short Film Festival
 
Logo: Go Short — International Short Film Festival Nijmegen
 
Logo: Internationale Kurzfilmtage Winterthur
 
Logo: Leuven International Short Film Festival
 
Logo: Minimalen Short Film Festival
 
Logo: Vilnius Short Film Festival
 
Logo: XPOSED Queer Film Festival Berlin
Supporting Festivals 
Logo: Bucharest International Experimental Film Festival
 
Logo: Curtas Vila do Conde
 
Logo: IDFA
 
Logo: Lago Film Fest
 
Logo: Leiden Shorts
 
Logo: Lviv International Short Film Festival Wiz-Art
 
Logo: Tampere Film Festival
Content Partners 
Logo: Kortfilm.be
 
Logo: This Is Short
Industry Collaborators 
Logo: The Short Film Lab
 
Logo: SFC Rendez-vous Industry Festival de Cannes
We are using cookies for analytics purposes.
See our Privacy Policy